Unc Essay Prompts 2012

As a reading specialist at UNC-Chapel Hill, Mary Willingham met athletes who told her they had never read a book and didn’t know what a paragraph was. She said she saw diagnostic tests that showed they were unable to do college-level work.

But many of those athletes stayed eligible to play sports, she said, because the academic support system provided improper help and tolerated plagiarism. When she raised questions or made an objection to what she saw as cheating, she said, she saw no one take her concerns seriously.

Willingham, who still works at the university but not with athletes, said she lodged complaints at least two years before UNC’s academic problems erupted into scandal. She channeled some of her frustration into a thesis for her master’s degree, on the corrupting influence of big-money sports on university academics.

But after attending the recent funeral of former UNC system President Bill Friday, a prominent critic of revenue-driven college sports, and seeing that no one within the program was willing to admit that they had been aware of a problem, Willingham decided it was time to go public.

Never miss a local story.

Sign up today for a free 30 day free trial of unlimited digital access.


In a series of interviews with The News & Observer, she said there were numerous people in the academic support program who knew that what was going on was wrong, but they looked the other way, helping to protect one of the nation’s most storied athletic programs.

Among her assertions:

•  The no-show classes that had been offered by the chairman of the Department of African and Afro-American Studies date back at least to the time Willingham began working for the support program in 2003. Commonly known within the program as “paper classes,” they were billed as lecture classes, but the classes never met.

Willingham learned of them when she was asked to work with a female athlete on a paper. Willingham said the paper was a “cut-and-paste” job, but when she raised questions about it, staff members told her not to worry. The student later received a grade of B or better.

•  Members of the men’s basketball team took no-show classes until the fall semester of 2009, when the team was assigned a new academic counselor. The new counselor was appalled to learn of the classes, and wanted no part of them. University records show the enrollments stopped that semester for basketball players, while they continued for football players.

•  Numerous football and basketball players came to the university with academic histories that showed them incapable of doing college-level work, especially at one of the nation’s top public universities. Diagnostic tests administered by the university confirmed their lack of preparedness and also identified learning disabilities that would need extensive remediation to put them on a successful academic path.

Some athletes told Willingham they had never read a book or written a paragraph, but they were placed in no-show classes that required a 20-page paper and came away with grades of B or better.

•  Roughly five years ago, Bobbi Owen, the senior associate dean who had oversight of the academic support program, sought to rein in the number of independent studies offered by the African studies department, which by then averaged nearly 200 a year. Independent studies required no class time and often not much more than a term paper; they were popular with football and basketball players.

University records show that the number of independent study enrollments plummeted in the past five years compared with the previous five. Those courses have also been cited for a lack of academic integrity.

Willingham, 51, said most of the athletes in the nonrevenue sports are capable of doing college-level work. But lowered academic standards for the football players and men’s basketball players – known as “special admits” – brought in athletes who lacked the academic ability, while still being expected to devote at least 20 hours a week to their sports.

She called that a dynamic destined to produce cheating. The special admissions go at least as far back as the early 1990s.

“There are serious literacy deficits and they cannot do the course work here,” Willingham said. “And if you cannot do the course work here, how do you stay eligible? You stay eligible by some department, some professor, somebody who gives you a break. That’s everywhere across the country. Here it happened with paper classes. There’s no question.”

An easy path

Willingham is the first person from inside the academic support program to go public with details about its operations. Other information has come through records released by the university or obtained by The N&O from other sources. The university has confirmed that there were at least 54 such no-show classes in the past four years that didn’t meet and required only a term paper at the end.

They were largely filled with athletes. Other records have identified two other no-show classes – and suggest the classes go back at least a dozen years and were known within the support program as an easy path for athletes.

Plagiarism has also emerged as an issue with these classes and with another class athletes took. Some internal records from the support program show tutors struggled to fix papers submitted by football players that were largely filled with plagiarized passages. Academic profiles describe some of the players as needing major help reading and interpreting academic works.

The academic fraud has prompted four investigations, including one led by former Gov. Jim Martin, who has the task of trying to determine when it started and how far it reached. The NCAA has not gotten involved, though officials say they are monitoring the situation.

Last month, Willingham started a blog called “Athletics vs. Academics, a Clash of Cultures.” Martin and a representative of the accounting firm Baker Tilly, which has been hired to help Martin investigate the no-show classes, interviewed her a few days later.

Martin declined to talk about what she said. But he was no longer standing by what he had said prior to her interview: that no one in the program had seen a problem with the no-show classes. Instead, he said he couldn’t comment.

Chancellor Holden Thorp declined to discuss Willingham’s assertions.

“I’m not going to talk to you about this stuff because we’ve got this thing going on with Gov. Martin, and that’s where our focus is right now, and these are the kinds of matters we’re working on,” Thorp said. “That’s all I’ve got to say about it right now.”

Calls and emails to other university officials, former and current academic support program staff and others to address Willingham’s assertions were either not returned, drew no comment or no response.

Steve Kirschner, an athletic department spokesman, said in email messages Friday that the last basketball player to major in African or Afro-American studies graduated in 2009. He said interest had declined in the department’s majors after 2005, and chalked it up to “(d)ifferent players have different interests.”

Last month, The N&O questioned men’s basketball coach Roy Williams as to why his players stopped enrolling in no-show classes by the fall of 2009. Williams offered no explanation other than a suggestion that players may have decided on their own not to take them.

Willingham said a new academic counselor assigned to the team in summer 2009 told her she would not enroll the players in the no-show classes. “She said, ‘I didn’t come here ... to do this. Everything has to be on the up and up,’ ” Willingham recalled.

In interviews, Willingham declined to name the new counselor, but university records show that Jennifer Townsend was hired as an associate director in August 2009 and took over the role of academic counselor for the men’s basketball team. She replaced Wayne Walden, whom Williams had described as one of the most important people in his program.

Townsend’s profile on UNC-CH’s website shows she was the academic counselor for men’s and women’s basketball at the University of Minnesota. She worked there after the university went through one of the most notorious scandals in college basketball history.

In 1999, the St. Paul Pioneer Press uncovered a cheating scandal involving a former university office manager who had written papers, filled out take-home exams and done other course work for 20 basketball players over a five-year period. The NCAA hit the university with numerous sanctions and wiped a 1997 Final Four appearance from the record books.

Townsend did not return messages to her work or cell phones.

A suspect paper

Willingham said after her early experience with the female athlete’s paper, she avoided the African studies papers by spending most of her time working with athletes in the nonrevenue sports, and by helping students with introductory English classes. But the issue arose again in 2008, she said, when she was asked to look at a history paper for a football player.

She said it, too, did not look like the student had written it. Willingham said she told the program director, Robert Mercer, that she believed the tutor, Jennifer Wiley, had done the work. Mercer referred Willingham to another academic counselor, who denied a problem and took no action, she said.

That was the last straw, she said, and she began seeking jobs outside of the academic support program. In early 2010, she began working for another learning center at UNC that serves nonathletes.

Two years after Willingham said she raised questions, NCAA investigators found that Wiley had written parts of papers for three football players. One of them, Willingham said, was the same football player she previously reported.

Wiley, who received a letter in 2010 that disassociated her from the university, has declined numerous requests to talk about her work for the support program. She did not talk to the university or the NCAA.

Mercer was moved to another job earlier this year. He could not be reached for comment.

Willingham said she met with university attorneys at their request in mid 2010, during the NCAA investigation, to discuss what happened in 2008. She said they thanked her for coming, and never talked to her again. She said she never heard from the NCAA.

Willingham provided no records to support her claims and would not identify specific athletes for fear that would violate the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, also known as FERPA. The law requires universities to keep most education records private or face the loss of federal funding.

University officials have repeatedly cited FERPA in declining to discuss various developments in the academic fraud case, or to produce records related to it. They have also released statements criticizing the disclosure of such records, which have been some of the strongest pieces of evidence as to the extent of the scandal.

For the most part, Willingham does not blame the athletes. While she described a few as uncooperative and troublesome, many were “amazing kids” who wanted to succeed on the field and in the classroom, but they were so far behind academically that it was an almost impossible goal.

“It’s not right,” Willingham said. “It’s the adults who are not doing what they are supposed to do.”

News researcher David Raynor contributed to this report.

The University of North Carolina academic-athletic scandal was a controversy regarding alleged fraud and academic dishonesty committed by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC), which became one of the most widely publicized academic scandals in United States history.[1] Following a lesser scandal that began in 2010 involving academic fraud and improper benefits with the university's football program, two hundred questionable classes offered by the university's African and Afro-American Studies department (commonly known as AFAM) came to light. While initially the media focused more on the implications for the famous UNC men's basketball program, the university was placed on probation by its accrediting organization.

An internal investigation by the university released in 2011 and another investigation commissioned by former North Carolina governor Jim Martin in 2012 found numerous academic and ethical issues with the AFAM department, including unauthorized grade changes and faculty signatures, a disproportionate number of independent study class offerings relative to other departments, and an over-representation of student-athletes enrolled in such classes. Then in 2014 began charges and counter-charges between university officials and former learning specialist Mary Willingham, including disputes about statistics and methods of analysis by Willingham alleging that certain student-athletes are not academically qualified for college.[2] As a result of these revelations, the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools placed the university on probation for one year, which ended in June 2016. The National Collegiate Athletic Association completed its investigation in October 2017, finding no violations of its rules and imposing no athletic punishments.[3] The controversy sparked debate as to whether the university educated some of its student-athletes improperly and called into question the role of NCAA Division I athletics relative to the academic mission of NCAA-member colleges and universities.[4]


North Carolina football scandal[edit]

Main article: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill football scandal

Greg Barnes of Inside Carolina initially broke the scandal with ESPN following closely behind. On July 15, 2010, ESPN reported that the NCAA interviewed several North Carolina football players over alleged gifts, extra benefits, and sports agent involvement.[5] Reportedly, the investigation began after North Carolina defensive tackle Marvin Austin made a post on Twitter on May 29 that year, and the post contained a reference to a nightclub in Miami in which a sports agent's party had taken place two months earlier. The university later suspended Austin and over ten other football players from the team.[7][8] On October 11, 2010, Austin was expelled from the football team, and the NCAA declared wide receiver Greg Little and defensive end Robert Quinn "permanently ineligible" due to receiving improper benefits.[7]

On August 26, 2010, the NCAA began a separate investigation of North Carolina football that involved possible academic fraud involving a tutor in the university's academic support program. The tutor was later identified as Jennifer Wiley (as of 2013[update] known as Jennifer Wiley Thompson due to marriage).[9][10] Another source familiar with the investigation said that Wiley was accused of "inappropriate help on papers that football players were required to write for classes."[9] However, Baddour said on September 24 that Wiley declined to cooperate with the NCAA.[9]

Because the university felt that the NCAA investigation was extremely embarrassing to the university's reputation, North Carolina fired football head coach Butch Davis on July 27, 2011.[11] The next day, athletic director Dick Baddour announced that he would resign and allow chancellor Holden Thorp to hire a football head coach.[12]

On March 12, 2012, the NCAA issued formal sanctions against North Carolina football: a postseason ban for 2012, reductions of 15 scholarships, and 3 years of probation. The NCAA found North Carolina guilty of multiple infractions, including academic fraud and failure to monitor the football program. However, the NCAA did not find anything extending to lack of institutional control, explaining that the university "educated its tutors regarding academic improprieties and its coaches regarding outside athletically related income...self-discovered the academic fraud and took decisive action...cooperated fully, is not a repeat violator and...exhibited appropriate control over its athletics program."[14] In November 2013, the university sent a letter of disassociation to Austin, Little, and Quinn.[15]

Academic irregularities and punishment[edit]

The crux of the alleged irregularities proceeded from the UNC Department of African and Afro-American Studies (commonly known as AFAM). Over approximately fifteen years, the department offered two hundred independent study courses, many without full adherence to University procedure for course provisioning or sufficient professorial oversight. The irregularities called into question the Department's academic integrity and led to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools putting the university on academic probation for one year, an almost unprecedented step against a major research university.[16]


A basic charge by critics was that UNC did not live up to its end of the bargain by not sufficiently educating some of its student-athletes.[2] Rebecca Schuman of Slate.com accused the university of "abjectly failing some of its students" by keeping them "functionally illiterate."[17]

Gerald Gurney, president of the Drake Group for Academic Integrity in College Sport, called UNC "the mother of all academic fraud violations" because of "cooperation of friendly faculty and [a] cover-up."[18] Paul M. Barrett, in a cover story for the March 3, 2014 Bloomberg Businessweek magazine, wrote: "...rather than seriously investigate the connection between sports and classroom corruption, top university administrators used vague committee reports to obfuscate the issue."[2]

[19]Reporter Dan Kane of the News & Observer was part of a three-person investigative team which exposed the scandal, despite substantial resistance by the university, according to a subsequent report in the New York Times.[19] Kane has been criticized by detractors for leading a "wrongheaded effort" to link college sports with academic improprieties; college administrators "no longer take his calls", and some faculty describe his efforts as a witch hunt for a conspiracy that does not exist.[19]

Initial accusations[edit]

Suspicions about the UNC Department of African and Afro-American Studies (commonly known as AFAM) were raised as early as 2011. UNC defensive end Michael McAdoo filed a lawsuit against the NCAA on July 1, 2011 seeking reinstatement to the football team.[20] The NCAA declared McAdoo ineligible for accepting improper benefits and committing academic fraud, based on the UNC Undergraduate Honor Court finding that McAdoo committed academic dishonesty by having Jennifer Wiley complete a bibliography and works-cited section on a research paper for an AFAM class.[20] From this lawsuit, McAdoo was forced to make public the paper; an analysis by Dan Kane of the Raleigh News & Observer found that the Honor Court failed to find multiple instances of plagiarism in McAdoo's paper.[21] On July 13, a North Carolina Superior Court judge in Durham refused to grant an injunction against the NCAA, thus upholding ineligibility for McAdoo.[21]

Then in August, Dan Kane reported that football player Marvin Austin took a 400-level course in the department the summer before his freshman fall semester. According to an academic adviser at the university, "it is unusual for any freshman to begin his or her college education with a 400 level course."[22] On September 1, 2011, just over a week after Kane's article about Austin's transcript was published, AFAM department chair Julius Nyang'oro resigned from his executive position but remained on faculty.[23]

More controversy for AFAM came after the transcript of former North Carolina football and basketball player Julius Peppers was found under a University of North Carolina web address (www.unc.edu) by members of PackPride, a Scout.com community for fans of rival school NC State.[24][25] A university staffer originally posted the transcript with Peppers's identifying information removed on a secure UNC server as a test record in 2001. Six years later, another staffer mistakenly moved the test record to an unsecured server.[25] The transcript showed a cumulative grade point average of 1.82 from the summer 1998 to spring 2001 terms with 11 grades of D or F.[24] Additionally, Peppers's grades for AFAM classes were on average higher than for non-AFAM classes, and Peppers was never academically ineligible for athletic competition despite his grades.[26] Through his agent, Peppers confirmed that the transcript was his and stated that there was "no academic fraud."[27] University chancellor Holden Thorp later apologized to Peppers.[25]

Reviews of AFAM[edit]

On May 2, 2012, UNC released the results of an internal investigation into AFAM courses commissioned by Jonathan Hartlyn, senior associate dean for social sciences and global programs, and William L. Andrews, senior associate dean for fine arts and humanities.[28] The report examined AFAM classes from the summer 2007 to summer 2011 sessions.[29] Among the findings in the Hartlyn-Andrews report:

  • Nearly 40 percent of students enrolled in questionable AFAM classes were football and basketball players.[30]
  • However, there was no evidence showing that student-athletes who took AFAM classes got preferential treatment.[29]
  • AFAM administrator Deborah Crowder likely oversaw scheduling and grade rosters of questionable classes.[29]
  • Nearly nine classes lacked evidence that a professor taught course material and graded work. For one Swahili class, the syllabus listed AFAM chair Julius Nyang'oro as professor, but Nyang'oro told university investigators that he did not teach that class. For 40 other courses listing Nyang'oro as instructor, mostly during summer sessions, a professor was present during class but seldom taught.[29]

Martin Report (2012)[edit]

On December 19, 2012, UNC released a report, commissioned by former North Carolina governor Jim Martin, in collaboration with accounting firm Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP. The report examined data back to the 1990s. Among its findings:

  • Student-athletes were disproportionately enrolled in suspect classes.[2]
  • From the 1990s through 2011, AFAM offered two hundred lecture courses that never took place, as well as offering dubious independent study programs that required little work to complete.[2][18][31] Also, some professors never showed up to teach classes.[32] In some instances, the only course requirement of students was to submit a paper at the end of the class.[2][19][32]
  • In "dozens of instances", eight professors "were unwittingly and indirectly compromised" when their signatures were forged by others on grade rosters. However, no evidence showed that any other faculty member than Julius Nyang'oro or Deborah Crowder was involved in wrongdoing.[33]
  • Among grade changes for student-athletes, 106 were identified as "unauthorized", 454 as "potentially unauthorized", 373 were "inconclusive", and 203 were legitimate.[34]

There were felony fraud charges brought against Nyang'oro for being paid $12,000 to teach a non-existent class, but these charges were dropped by the Orange County district attorney based on recommendations from Kenneth Wainstein in exchange for Nyang'oro's cooperation.[18]

Accusations by Mary Willingham[edit]

The athletic scholarship is just a lottery ticket with room and board, and a few concussions. Or, if you like Willy Wonka, it’s the golden ticket to win a tour here at our factory – where, by the way, you might get injured, or damaged. And there’s no insurance, no worker’s comp and no salary for your labor.

— Mary Willingham, in 2014[35]

One of the academic tutors assigned to help student-athletes was Mary Willingham, who was hired by the university in 2003 to assist student-athletes with their academic work. Willingham's 2009 Master of Arts thesis for the University of North Carolina at Greensboro was titled Academics & athletics - a clash of cultures: Division I football programs and asserted in part: "While admission standards are on the rise at major public universities, many under-prepared student-athletes (football) are admitted each year because they are the 'best' player in the state/country, creating academic disparities."[37] In a November 2012 interview with Dan Kane of The News & Observer, Willingham made her initial claims about the university helping student-athletes stay eligible via improper assistance.[2] In 2013, the Drake Group gave Willingham the Robert Maynard Hutchins Award for being "a university faculty or staff member who defends the institution’s academic integrity in the face of college athletics."[35][35][38]

In early 2014, Willingham went to national media to express her concerns about the university. In interviews with Sara Ganim of CNN in January and Paul M. Barrett of Bloomberg Businessweek in March, Willingham alleged:

  • Students accessed a team-maintained computer hard drive which contained a database of previous papers, and submitted recycled documents with cosmetic changes.[2]
  • Some student-athletes reading below college levels. In an interview with CNN, Willingham claimed that 60% of 183 UNC football and basketball players, which she analyzed from 2004 to 2012, were reading at fourth- to eighth-grade levels, and that 10% read below a third-grade level.[35]
  • She steered academically disadvantaged student-athletes towards enrolling in sham AFAM lecture courses.[2][18]
  • The university was playing a "shell game" to prevent student-athletes from having to do any serious studying.[2]

In response to Willingham's claims about student-athlete literacy, UNC released another report by a board of educational experts outside the university that examined data between 2004 and 2012. That report found that there were 341 men’s and women’s basketball players and football players during these years; of this group, 34 students did not meet CNN’s threshold of being "college literate", which meant a minimum SAT reading score of 400 or an ACT score of 16; essentially, the university suggested that of its athletes, ten percent had academic issues.[39] This is in contrast with the allegation by Mary Willingham, based on her personal investigations, that 60% of college athletes were not "college literate".[39] In another of her analyses, she found that 150 to 200 of 400 student-athletes were "underperforming", some "badly underperforming", with the last group being mostly made of men's and women's players of basketball and football.[2] One view suggested that the university's response to these and other allegations was to try to change the focus away from wrongdoing, in part by challenging Willingham's assertions and research.[40] The review board disputed her findings on the grounds that her methodology was not appropriate.[39]

A series of emails released on 11/29/2015 containing 20,000+ pages of communications, including emails between Mary Willingham and other UNC staff members, seem to lend credence to the review board's refutation of Willinghams's methodology. Willingham never provided the methodology she used to come to her conclusions. Notwithstanding the fact that there is no methodology for combining multiple tests to determine grade levels, however there was one person who could completely confirm Willingham's findings. Lyn Johnson was the psychologist who administered and scored the tests in question and aggregated the data for the UNC academic support program. In a January 16, 2014 email exchange between Johnson and Willingham, Johnson asks Willingham to explain her conclusions, stating "Where did you get the 60% reading below 8th grade level?" Willingham didn't explain how, and that Johnson had to ask confirms Willingham didn't obtain her conclusions from Johnson. This strongly supports the review board's findings that Willinghams's methodology was not appropriate.[41]

Willingham also was interviewed by Bernard Goldberg in a report for HBO's Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel that was broadcast on March 25, 2014. The report was a general look at how some top NCAA Division I schools hire learning specialists like Willingham to help keep student-athletes eligible.[42] A representative for UNC stated in response that HBO reported on "information that has previously been reported and discussed."[43]

A segment by ESPN's Outside the Lines from March 25, 2014[44] drew attention because Willingham showed a 146-word essay about Rosa Parks and claimed that an unnamed student-athlete at UNC earned an A-minus in an AFAM class for turning that essay in. However, according to Slate.com, the paper shown by Willingham "was most likely a draft of one piece of a take-home final for a legitimate introductory course."[45]The News & Observer stated in a clarification note to a story that mentioned that essay: "It is unclear what grade the student received for the essay. Willingham said it was a class that met, and had other assignments."[46]

In April 2014, Willingham announced her resignation.[47] In June 2014, Willingham filed a lawsuit against UNC.[48]

In August 2014, citing posts in the Scout.com UNC message board Inside Carolina, Dan Kane reported in The News & Observer that passages in Willingham's 2009 master's thesis appeared to be plagiarized.[49]

Accusations by Rashad McCants[edit]

North Carolina guard Rashad McCants is required to go to class, to show up on time for practice and to attend study hall. He has very little of the freedom most college students take for granted.

— Associated Press reporter Keith Parsons in a 2004 profile of McCants

When you get to college, you don’t go to class, you don’t do nothing, you just show up and play ... That’s exactly how it was, you know, and I think that was the tradition of college basketball, or college, period, any sport. You’re not there to get an education, though they tell you that.

— Rashad McCants, speaking on Outside the Lines in 2014[31]

"The question is what are we talking about, honestly. I mean I have a check being written to me from the University of North Carolina for over $10 million due to the exploitation of me as a player and the lack of education that I received. The NCAA has a check for me for over $300 million to help me facilitate these sports education programs across the country. These are things that’s in the works."

— Rashad McCants, speaking on Mark Packers' Sirius XM radio show in 2014[51]

On June 6, 2014, the ESPN program Outside the Lines broadcast an interview with Rashad McCants, who was a starter on the North Carolina basketball team that won the 2005 NCAA championship, in which McCants claimed to have taken phony classes and had tutors write his classwork.[31][52] However, all sixteen other members of the 2005 team released a statement which disputed McCants's account.[52] Additionally, coach Roy Williams, separately interviewed by the same program, disputed McCants's claims.[53] In contrast, in a noted 2004 interview with television station WRAL, McCants compared attending UNC with being in jail.[54]

Interviewed again on Outside the Lines on June 11, McCants stood by his claims about his academic experience at North Carolina. He also called on his fellow members of the 2004–05 basketball team to release their university transcripts because, in his opinion, "the truth is there in the transcripts" regarding bogus classes.[55]

University officials contacted McCants via mail and text message in the days following ESPN's initial interview with McCants, because McCants expressed "knowledge of potential NCAA rule violations involving the University of North Carolina," according to a letter signed by the athletics director of compliance.[56] However, McCants had not responded as of July 7, nor had he discussed his claims with the NCAA, according to the Associated Press.[57]

Actions by the university[edit]

Wainstein Report (2014)[edit]

In February 2014, the university hired Kenneth L. Wainstein, a former official in the United States Department of Justice, to conduct an independent investigation.[58][59]

Our goal is to create an academic success program that is one of the best, if not the leader, among peer universities.

— Joel Curran, UNC vice chancellor of communications[59]

On October 22, 2014, the report was released reporting that for 18 years, at least 3,100 students took "nonexistent" classes, saying, "These counselors saw the paper classes and the artificially high grades they yielded as key to helping some student-athletes remain eligible." The report named both Julius Nyang’oro and Debbie Crowder as facilitators of the practice.[60][61][62]


Some reforms have been instituted. These included better governance standards, more accountability for support programs for student-athletes, new department structures, and more classroom audits and oversight of courses, according to a university source.[59] Employees called checkers were sent to classes to see whether, in fact, they were being held, as part of an improved auditing system.[32] Further, university officials made statements which affirmed that they were proud of the accomplishments of their sports programs and varsity teams.[32] An athletics director spoke highly of the university's scholarship program; one said most of their student-athletes graduate and have successful careers.[32] Some officials criticized the allegations; for example, a basketball coach objected that the allegations had slandered the "moral character of his players."[2]

The NCAA scholarships that students have been awarded for the past 50 years are the best scholarship program ever created with the possible exception of the GI Bill. While they’re not perfect, sports scholarships certainly provide great opportunities for an awful lot of students.

— Bubba Cunningham, UNC athletic director [2]


On October 13, 2017, the NCAA announced it would not levy penalties against North Carolina, saying it "could not conclude that the University of North Carolina violated N.C.A.A. academic rules."[63][64][65] In their defense, North Carolina cited cases where Auburn and Michigan had similar misconduct and the NCAA did not act.[63] It was ultimately concluded by the panel that the courses were for the entire student body, not just the student-athletes.[65] The panel did conclude that since Nyang'oro did not cooperate with the investigation he was issued a five-year show-cause period as punishment for him, "any NCAA member school employing the [Nyang'oro] must show cause why he should not have restrictions on athletically related activity."[65]

Committee on Infractions head for the NCAA, Greg Sankey, stated "While student-athletes likely benefited from the so-called ‘paper courses’ offered by North Carolina, the information available in the record did not establish that the courses were solely created, offered and maintained as an orchestrated effort to benefit student-athletes."[63] North Carolina chancellor Carol Folt commented on the resolution of the case when she said "I believe we have done everything possible to correct and move beyond the past academic irregularities and have established very robust processes to prevent them from recurring."[63] Tyrone P. Thomas, a lawyer for Mintz Levin and does work with colleges and universities, felt the ruling was "... a massive loophole, and from the P.R. side it looks horrible — these athletes can do what they do, and it looks horrible. But guess what? Maybe that’s not the N.C.A.A.’s job. This is something the schools have always self-regulated." [63]

See also[edit]


  1. ^"UNC Scandal". www.cbssports.com. June 4, 2014. 
  2. ^ abcdefghijklmBarrett, Paul M. (March 3, 2014). "In Fake Classes Scandal, UNC Fails Its Athletes—and Whistle-Blower". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved July 15, 2014.  
  3. ^https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/Oct2017_University-of-North-Carolina-at-Chapel-Hill_InfractionsDecision_20171013.pdf
  4. ^July 9, 2014, News Observer, Dan Kane, At US Senate hearing, NCAA's Emmert pledges to work for change, Accessed July 15, 2014, "...With several United States senators at a hearing Wednesday questioning whether the NCAA and its member schools care about the well-being of college athletes...."
  5. ^"Sources: NCAA probing UNC football". ESPN. July 15, 2010. Retrieved June 30, 2014. 
  6. ^ ab"Agent scandal costs UNC three players". ESPN. October 11, 2010. Retrieved June 28, 2014. 
  7. ^Associated Press (September 13, 2010). "Shaun Draughn returns to UNC lineup". ESPN.com. Retrieved June 30, 2014. 
  8. ^ abcPickeral, Robbi & Curliss, J. Andrew (September 25, 2010). "Tutor too close to athletes". Raleigh News & Observer. Retrieved June 30, 2014. 
  9. ^Blythe, Anne (October 3, 2013). "Former UNC tutor connected to football scandal charged with violating NC sports agent laws". News & Observer. Retrieved June 30, 2014. 
  10. ^"Butch Davis fired by Tar Heels". ESPN. July 27, 2011. Retrieved June 28, 2014. 
  11. ^Giglio, J.P. (July 29, 2011). "Baddour to step down as UNC athletics director". News & Observer. Archived from the original on August 30, 2011.  Published in print as "Baddour announces decision to step down as UNC-CH AD."
  12. ^Banowsky, Britton; et al. (March 12, 2012). "University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Public Infractions Report". NCAA. 
  13. ^Carter, Andrew (November 19, 2013). "UNC severs ties with Austin, Little, Quinn". Raleigh News & Observer. Retrieved June 28, 2014. 
  14. ^http://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/unc-academic-scandal-leaves-university-in-peril-beyond-athletics/
  15. ^Schuman, Rebecca. "Postdocs for Jocks: The latest UNC scandal reminds us that schools don't care about whether their athletes can read. I've got the solution". Slate. Retrieved July 15, 2014.  
  16. ^ abcdSara Ganim, CNN, July 3, 2014, Charges dropped in University of North Carolina 'paper classes' case, Accessed July 15, 2014, "...ex-professor Julius Nyang'oro would no longer be facing a felony fraud charge..."
  17. ^ abcdLyall, Sarah (April 27, 2014). "Reporter Digging Into Scandal Hits a University's Raw Nerve: University of North Carolina Is at Odds With a Raleigh Newspaper". Archived from the original on May 1, 2014. Retrieved July 15, 2014.  
  18. ^ abStaples, Andy (July 6, 2011). "McAdoo to put NCAA to test as he seeks injuction to end ineligibility". SI.com. Retrieved June 30, 2014. 
  19. ^ abKane, Dan (July 17, 2011). "UNC honor court failed to find McAdoo's obvious plagiarism". News & Observer. Retrieved June 30, 2014. 
  20. ^Kane, Dan (August 23, 2011). "Austin's UNC transcript raises questions". The News & Observer. Archived from the original on September 29, 2011. Retrieved April 28, 2016. 
  21. ^Kane, Dan (September 2, 2011). "UNC professor resigns academic chairman post". News & Observer. Retrieved June 30, 2014. 
  22. ^ abKane, Dan (August 13, 2012). "Peppers' transcript might point to broader academic issues at UNC". The News & Observer. Retrieved August 13, 2014. 
  23. ^ abc"How Julius Peppers' transcript was exposed". The News & Observer. August 31, 2012. Retrieved August 13, 2014. 
  24. ^Carter, Andrew (August 18, 2012). "Transcript shows low hurdles for UNC athletes to stay eligible". The News & Observer. Retrieved August 13, 2014. 
  25. ^Carter, Andrew (August 18, 2012). "Julius Peppers says transcript is his, says there was no academic fraud". The News & Observer. Retrieved August 13, 2014. 
  26. ^Hartlyn, Jonathan, and Andrews, William L. (May 2, 2012). "Review of courses in the Department of African and Afro-American Studies, College of Arts and Sciences"(PDF). University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved July 30, 2014. 
  27. ^ abcdKane, Dan (May 4, 2012). "Report finds academic fraud evidence in UNC department". The News & Observer. Retrieved July 30, 2014. 
  28. ^Kane, Dan (May 7, 2012). "UNC players made up 39 percent of suspect classes". News & Observer. Retrieved June 30, 2014. 
  29. ^ abcMorris, Ron (June 16, 2014). "UNC's alleged academic fraud just the tip of the iceberg". The State. Columbia, S.C.: McClatchy. Retrieved July 15, 2014.  
  30. ^ abcdeDudash, April (January 10, 2014). "UNC responds to report condemning student-athletes' reading levels". Durham Herald-Sun. Retrieved July 15, 2014.  
  31. ^Martin, James G. (December 19, 2012), The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Academic Anomalies Review Report of Findings(PDF), UNC Chapel Hill, p. ii, retrieved July 29, 2014 
  32. ^Martin Report, pp. 8-9.
  33. ^ abcdCarter, Andrew (2013-04-18). "Honored UNC employee talks of how university failed athletes". The News & Observer. Retrieved 2014-06-06. 
The March 3, 2014 Bloomberg BusinessWeek magazine had a cover story by Paul M. Barrett alleging academic improprieties by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill regarding student-athletes.
Former North Carolina governor Jim Martin commissioned a 2012 report that reviewed irregularities in the UNC Department of African and Afro-American Studies.
CNN reporter Sara Ganim brought national attention to former learning specialist Mary Willingham's accusations against the University of North Carolina regarding student-athletes and academics.
Rashad McCants, a member of the North Carolina basketball team that won the 2005 NCAA championship, received national attention for claiming to have had a substandard education at North Carolina. He met with Representative Tony Cárdenas (left) to discuss NCAA reform issues.
Former U.S. Department of Justice official Kenneth L. Wainstein commissioned an independent investigative report of the UNC AFAM department.
North Carolina versus Michigan State basketball game.

One thought on “Unc Essay Prompts 2012

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *